五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R255.6

基金项目:

温州市基础性科研项目(Y2020908)


Clinical Study on Five-Note Therapy Combined with Yi-Cupping for Low Back Pain of Liver-Kidney Depletion Syndrome
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛的临床疗效。方法:将80 例肝肾亏虚证腰痛患者按简单随机法分试验A 组、试验B 组、试验C 组及对照组各20 例。对照组接受基础药物治疗,试验A 组在对照组的基础上采用五音联合易罐疗法,试验B 组在对照组的基础上采用易罐疗法,试验C 组在对照组的基础上采用五音疗法。疗程均为2 周,观察比较4 组临床疗效,以及治疗前后疼痛数字评分法(NRS) 评分、汉密尔顿焦虑评分(HAMA) 的变化。结果:治疗后,试验A、试验B 组、试验C 组总有效率均高于对照组,试验A 组总有效率亦高于试验B 组、试验C 组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验B 组与试验C 组间总有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗前,4 组NRS 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,4 组NRS 评分均较治疗前显著降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验A 组、试验B 组NRS 评分均低于对照组(P<0.05),而试验C 组NRS 评分虽低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验A 组NRS 评分低于试验B 组(P<0.05);试验A 组、试验B 组NRS 评分均低于试验C 组(P<0.05)。治疗前,4 组HAMA 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,试验A 组HAMA 评分较治疗前显著降低(P<0.05);试验A 组HAMA 评分低于对照组、试验B 组(P<0.05),试验A 组HAMA 评分与试验C 组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验B 组、试验C 组、对照组HAMA 评分治疗前后及治疗后组间两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛,能显著改善患者疼痛及焦虑情绪,提高临床疗效。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To observe the clinical effect of five-note therapy combined with Yi-cupping for low back pain of liver-kidney depletion syndrome. Methods:A total of 80 cases of patients with low back pain of liver-kidney depletion syndrome were divided into the experiment group A,the experiment group B, the experiment group C and the control group, with 20 cases in each group. The control group was treated with basic medication;based on the treatment of the control group,the experiment group A was additionally treated with five- note therapy combined with Yi- cupping; the experiment group B was additionally treated with Yi-cupping therapy,and the experiment group C was additionally treated with fivenote therapy. All groups were treated for two weeks. Changes in the scores of Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA) before and after treatment as well as clinical effects in the four groups were observed and compared. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of experiment group A, experiment group B and experiment group C was higher than that of the control group(P<0.05);The total effective rate of group A was also higher than that of group B and group C(P<0.05).The total effective rate in the experiment group A was higher than those in the other three groups(P<0.05);the total effective rates in the experiment group B and the experiment group C were higher than that in the control group(P<0.05); there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of total effective rates between the experiment group B and the experiment group C(P>0.05). Before treatment, there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of scores of NRS among the four groups(P>0.05). After treatment, scores of NRS in the four groups were significantly decreased when compared with those before treatment,differences being significant(P<0.05);NRS scores in the experiment group A and the experiment group B were lower than that in the control group(P<0.05);NRS score in the experiment group C was lower than that in the control group,but there was no significance in the difference(P>0.05);NRS score in the experiment group A was lower than that in the experiment group B(P<0.05);NRS scores in the experiment group A and the experiment group B were lower than that in the experiment group C(P< 0.05). Before treatment,there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of HAMA scores among the four groups(P>0.05). After treatment, score of HAMA in the experiment group A was significantly decreased when compared with that before treatment(P<0.05);the score in the experiment group A was lower than those in the control group and the experiment group B(P<0.05); there was no significant difference being found in the comparison of HAMA scores between the experiment group A and the experiment group C(P>0.05). There was no significant difference being found in the comparison of HAMA scores in the experiment group B,the experiment group C and the control group before and after treatment and between groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:Five-note therapy combined with Yi-cupping for low back pain of liver- kidney depletion syndrome can significantly relieve pain and anxiety of patients and improve the clinical effect.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孟盈盈,李夏,余建敏,潘胜莲,卢韵琦.五音疗法联合易罐治疗肝肾亏虚证腰痛临床研究[J].新中医,2022,54(18):79-83

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码