中西医结合治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎疗效及安全性Meta 分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R563.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(81774222,82074411);河南省中医药科学研究重大专项(20-21ZYZD04);河南省中医药科学研究专项课 题(拔尖人才)(2019ZYBJ05)


Meta Analysis of Curative Effect and Safety of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:系统评价中西医结合治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP) 的临床疗效及安全性。方法:检索CNKI、Wanfang、VIP、sinoMed、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 等7 类数据库中有关中西医结合治疗VAP 的随机对照试验。2 名研究员根据纳入、排除标准进行文献筛选及资料提取,采用RenMan 5.4 软件、TSA0.9.5.10 Beta 软件、Stata15.0 软件对纳入研究进行Meta 分析。结果:共纳入24 项研究,涉及患者1 636 例,其中试验组834 例、对照组802 例。Meta 分析结果显示,试验组在提高总有效率[OR=3.02,95%CI (2.19,4.15),P<0.000 01]、脱机率[OR=2.08,95%CI (1.13,3.81),P=0.02],缩短ICU 住院时间[MD=-3.59,95%CI (-4.50,-2.68),P<0.000 01]、机械通气时间[MD=-2.62,95%CI (-2.89,-2.34),P<0.000 01],降低病死率[OR=0.33,95%CI (0.17,0.66),P=0.002]、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分[MD=-3.98,95%CI (-6.87,-1.09),P=0.007]、C-反应蛋白(CRP)[MD=-14.19,95%CI (-19.76,-8.62),P<0.000 01] 方面均优于对照组。试验组治疗未发现严重不良反应。试验序贯分析显示中西医结合治疗VAP的临床疗效较好。结论:中西医结合治疗VAP 的疗效优于单纯西医治疗,安全性较高。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To systematically evaluate the clinical effect and safety of integrated Chinese and western medicine for ventilator- associated pneumonia(VAP). Methods: Randomized controlled trials of integrated Chinese and western medicine for VAP were searched in databases of CNKI,WanFang,VIP, sinoMed, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Two researchers conducted literature screening and data extraction according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. RenMan 5.4 software, TSA0.9.5.10 Beta software and Stata15.0 software were applied for meta analysis of the included studies. Results:A total of 24 studies were included,involving 1 636 cases of patients,with 834 cases in the experiment group and 802 cases in the control group. Meta analysis showed that the improvement of the total effective rate [OR= 3.02,95%CI (2.19,4.15),P<0.000 01] and the offline rate [OR=2.08,95%CI(1.13,3.81),P=0.02], the shortening of the length of ICU stay [MD=- 3.59, 95% CI (- 4.50, - 2.68), P<0.000 01] and the duration of mechanical ventilation [MD=- 2.62, 95%CI (- 2.89, - 2.34), P<0.000 01], as well as the reduction of fatality rate [OR=0.33,95%CI (0.17,0.66),P=0.002],Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EraluationⅡscore (APACHE Ⅱ) scores [MD=- 3.98,95%CI (- 6.87, - 1.09), P=0.007] and C- reactive protein(CRP) [MD=- 14.19, 95% CI (- 19.76, - 8.62), P<0.000 01] in the experiment group were superior to those in the control group. No serious adverse reactions were found in the experiment group. The trial sequential analysis showed that the clinical effect of integrated Chinese and western medicine for VAP was better. Conclusion: Integrated Chinese and western medicine has a better curative effect and higher safety than simple western medicine in the treatment of VAP.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

关胜男,荆惠,谢凯,王海峰.中西医结合治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎疗效及安全性Meta 分析[J].新中医,2022,54(17):23-30

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-09-06
  • 出版日期: