中西医结合穴位埋线治疗不稳定型心绞痛临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R541.4

基金项目:


Clinical Study on Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Therapy Combined with Point Catgut Embedment for Unstable Angina Pectoris
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察中西医结合穴位埋线治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床疗效。方法:将120 例符合纳入标准的不稳定型心绞痛患者采用随机数字表法分为中西医结合穴位埋线组和西药组,每组各60 例。西药组予常规西药治疗,中西医结合穴位埋线组在常规西药治疗的基础上联合穴位埋线治疗。2 组均治疗1 年后评价临床疗效,比较中医证候积分、西雅图心绞痛量表(SAQ) 积分,以及急性心肌梗死(AMI) 发生率。结果:AMI 发生率中西医结合穴位埋线组5.0%,西药组16.7%,2 组AMI 发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。中西医结合穴位埋线组中医证候各项(包括心前区疼痛、乏力气短、心悸自汗、形寒肢冷遇寒胸痛) 积分治疗前后比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,中西医结合穴位埋线组各项积分分别与西药组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,中西医结合穴位埋线组SAQ 积分(包括活动受限程度、心绞痛稳定状态、心绞痛发作情况) 均有升高,治疗前后比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗后西药组SAQ 的3 项积分分别与治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,2 组间SAQ 的3 项积分分别比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。心电图总有效率中西医结合穴位埋线组94.7%,西药组74.0%,2 组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。不稳定型心绞痛疗效总有效率中西医结合穴位埋线组94.7%,西药组74.0%,2 组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中西医结合穴位埋线治疗不稳定型心绞痛可缓解患者临床症状,减少心肌梗死发生率,效果优于单纯使用标准的内科常规西药治疗。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical effect of integrated Chinese and western medicine therapy combined with point catgut embedment on unstable angina pectoris. Methods : A total of 120 patients with unstable angina pectoris who met the inclusion criteria were divided into the combination group(point catgut embedment combined with western medicine) and the western medicine group according to the random number table method,with 60 cases in each group. The western medicine group was treated with routine western medicine, and the combination group was treated with point catgut embedment based on the treatment of routine western medicine. The clinical effects in the two groups were evaluated after one year of treatment, and the Chinese medicine syndrome scores, the scores of Seattle Angina Questionnaire(SAQ), and the incidence of acute myocardial infarction were compared. Results: The incidence of AMI was 5.0% in the combination group and 16.7% in the western medicine group, the difference being significant(P<0.05). In the combination group, there were significant differences being found in the comparisons of Chinese medicine syndromes scores of precordial pain,lack of strength and shortness of breath,palpitation and spontaneous sweating,cold body and limbs,and pain in chest when cold before and after treatment(P<0.05). After treatment,there were significant differences being found in the comparisons of each Chinese medicine syndrome score between the two groups, differences being significant(P<0.05). After treatment,the scores of SAQ in the combination group were increased, including scores of degree of activity limitation, the stable state of angina pectoris and the attack of angina pectoris, and there were significant differences in the comparisons of them before and after treatment(P<0.01). After treatment,the SAQ scores in the western medicine group were compared with those before treatment, differences being significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the above three scores of SAQ were compared between the two groups,differences being significant(P<0.05). The total effective rate of electrocardiogram was 94.7% in the combination group and 74.0% in the western medicine group, the difference being significant(P<0.05). The total effective rate of unstable angina pectoris was 94.7% in the combination group and 74.0% in the western medicine group,the difference being significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Integrated Chinese and western medicine therapy combined with point catgut embedment can relieve the clinical symptoms of patients with unstable angina pectoris, reduce the incidence of myocardial infarction,and the effect is better than the standard medical treatment alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

冯臻谛,冯胜春,梁静华,赵洋洋,冯胜奎.中西医结合穴位埋线治疗不稳定型心绞痛临床研究[J].新中医,2022,54(14):170-175

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-21
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码