Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Postoperative Delirium in Patients Undergone Heart Valve Replacement Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:观察经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS) 对体外循环下心脏瓣膜置换术患者术后谵妄(POD) 的影响。方法:择期行体外循环下心脏瓣膜置换术患者45 例,按随机数字表法分为3 组各15 例:观察组、对照组1 和对照组2。观察组于麻醉诱导前30 min 至术毕电刺激神庭穴和大椎穴,模式为2/100 Hz 疏密波,刺激强度以患者能耐受的酸胀感为度,在5~20 mA 之间。对照组1 选取神庭穴和大椎穴向左旁开2 cm 处,方法同观察组。对照组2 为在神庭穴和大椎穴贴上电极,连接经皮穴位电刺激仪,但不给予刺激。评估患者术后1 d、2 d 和3 d 发生谵妄的情况。记录术中体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间、手术时间、术中总出入量和麻醉药用量;记录术后带管时间,重症监护病房(ICU) 停留时间、住院时间和芬太尼和咪达唑仑用量;术后1 d 和3 d用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA) 检测血清中白细胞介素-6(IL-6) 水平。结果:对照组1 和对照组2 中各有1 例患者POD 持续了2 d;对照组2 中有1 例患者在术后3 d 时出现谵妄。观察组无论是术后1~3 d 的谵妄发生率还是总的谵妄发生率均低于对照组1 和对照组2,差异无统计学意义(P=0.66)。3 组术后IL-6 水平均较术前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。组间比较,术后1 d 时,观察组血清IL-6 水平在低于对照组1 和对照组2,与对照组2 的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3 组患者术中各指标及术中麻醉药用量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3 组患者术后各指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:TEAS 未减少体外循环下心脏瓣膜置换术患者POD 的发生,但可以抑制围术期炎性反应。
Abstract:
Abstract: Objective: To observe the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation(TEAS) on postoperative delirium(POD) in patients undergoing heart valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: 45 patients undergoing heart valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass were randomly divided into three groups: observation group, control group 1 and control group 2. In the observation group, Shenting point(DU24) and Dazhui point(DU14) were electrically stimulated 30 min before anesthesia induction to the end of operation. The mode was 2/100 Hz density wave. The stimulation intensity was 5- 20 mA based on the acid swelling feeling that the patient could tolerate. In control group 1, shenting point and Dazhui point were 2 cm to the left,and the method was the same as that in the observation group. In control group 2,electrodes were pasted at Shenting and Dazhui points and connected with percutaneous acupoint electrical stimulator,but no stimulation was given. The occurrence of delirium at 1,2 and 3 days after operation was evaluated. The cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic occlusion time, operation time, total intraoperative volume and anesthetic dosage were recorded. Postoperative tube time,stay time in intensive care unit(ICU),length of hospital stay and dosage of fentanyl and midazolam were recorded. The level of serum interleukin-6(IL-6) was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) at 1 and 3 days after operation. Results:POD lasted for 2 days in control group 1 and control group 2;One patient in control group 2 developed delirium 3 days after operation. Both the incidence of delirium and the total incidence of delirium in the observation group 1- 3 days after operation were lower than those in control group 1 and control group 2, and the difference was not statistically significant(P=0.66). The average level of IL-6 in the three groups was higher than that before operation(P<0.05). The level of serum IL- 6 in the observation group was lower than that in control group 1 and control group 2 at 1 day after operation, which was significantly different from that in control group 2(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative indexes and intraoperative anesthetic dosage among the three groups(P>0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative indexes among the three groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:TEAS does not reduce the incidence of POD in patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass, but can inhibit the perioperative inflammatory response.