| 摘要: |
| 目的:观察中医推拿配合中药离子导入治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床疗效。方法:选取86例神经根型颈椎病患者,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组43例。对照组予颈肌间沟注射药物治疗,治疗组采用中医推拿手法配合中药离子导入治疗。观察2组治疗前后视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分的变化,评估临床疗效。结果:治疗前,2组VAS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,2组VAS评分均较治疗前降低,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组的VAS评分比对照组下降更明显,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治愈率79.0%,总有效率93.0%;对照组治愈率53.5%,总有效率74.4%。2组治愈率及总有效率比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:中医推拿联合中药离子导入治疗神经根型颈椎病比使用颈肌间沟注射药物治疗效果更好。 |
| 关键词: 神经根型颈椎病 中医推拿 中药离子导入 颈肌间沟注射 视觉模拟评分法(VAS) |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
|
|
| () |
| Abstract: |
| Objective：To observe the clinical effect of Chinese medicine(CM)Tuina and CM iontophoresis for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Methods：Selected 86 cases of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy patients，and divided them into the treatment group and the control group randomly，43 cases in each group.The control group was treated with cervical interscalene injection，while the treatment group was treated with CM Tuina combined with CM iontophoresis.Observed change of visual analogue scale(VAS)of both groups before and after treatment，and evaluated the clinical effect.Results：Before treatment，compared VAS scores of the two groups，there was no significant difference(P＞0.05).After treatment，VAS scores of both group were lower than those before treatment(P＜0.05)；and decline of VAS scores of the treatment group was more obvious than that of the control group(P＜0.05).The cure rate and total effective rate were 79.0%and 93.0%in the treatment group respectively，and were 53.5%and 74.4%in the control group respectively，differences of the two groups being significant(P＜0.05).Conclusion：The combination of CM Tuina and CM iontophoresis has better efficacy than apply cervical interscalene injection for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. |
| Key words: Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy Chinese medicine tuina Chinese medicine iontophoresis Cervical interscalene injection Visual analogue scale(VAS) |
